Open Journal Systems

Partnership Strategies for Creative Placemaking in Teaching Entrepreneurial Artists

Amy Whitaker

Abstract


As entrepreneurship education for artists expands, business strategy itself gets adapted to the particular ways in which artists are creative placemakers. Traditional business strategy is based on competition for scarce resources—as exemplified in Michael Porter’s iconic Porter’s Five Forces analysis and as extended to non-profit management by Sharon Oster’s Sixth Force which includes donors. Yet creative placemaking often entails collaboration. Even in underfunded fields in which resources are in fact scarce, business strategy frameworks that are based on partnership and collaboration—most notably Brandenberger and Nalebuff’s “ValueNet”—better suit community engagement and partnership strategies associated with creative placemaking. This paper takes as a case study a workshop taught to choreographers and other movement artists at the Lower Manhattan Cultural Council, in collaboration with the Actors Fund. The core question of the ValueNet—“If I succeed, who succeeds with me?"—has led to unexpected ways of mapping the ecosystem of the arts, and fruitful community engagement. In reimagining business strategy more holistically, this approach is also part of a larger pedagogy toward a principles-based, rather than rules-based, model of teaching business as a creative design medium itself.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brandenberger, A.M. and Nalebuff, B.J. (1996). Co-opetition. New York: Crown.

Essig, L. and Flanagan, M. (2015; updated 2016). “How It’s Being Done: Art Business Training Across the U.S.” Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation and Arizona State University.

Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.

Friedman, M. (1980). “Power of the Market,” Free to Choose, PBS, Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5Gppi-O3a8

Jackson, M.R., Kabwasa-Green, F., Swenson, D., Herranz Jr., J., Ferryman, K., Atlas, C., Wallner, E., & Rosenstein, C. (2003). Investing in Creativity: A Study of the Support Structure for U.S. Artists. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, n.d.

Maslow, A.H. (1943). “A Hierarchy of Human Motivation,” Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.

McAndrew, C. (2017). The Art Market 2017. Basel and Zurich: Art Basel and UBS.

Oster, S.M. (1995) Strategic Management for Non-Profit Organizations. New York: Oxford.

Porter, M.E. (1979, 2007 reprint). “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy,” Harvard Business Review.

Read, L.E. (December 1958). “I, Pencil: My Family Tree as Told to Leonard E. Read,” Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved from http://www.econlib.org/ library/Essays/rdPncl1.html

Schumpeter, J.A. (1942, 2008 reprint). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 3rd ed. London and New York: Routledge, 81–86.

Smith, A. (1776; edited by Andrew Skinner, 1999). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Books I–III. New York and London: Penguin Classics, 109–10.

Skaggs, R. (2016) “The Career Skills and Entrepreneurship Training for Artist: Results of the 2015 SNAAP Survey Module,” Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation and Indiana University.

Stuckey, J. and White, J. (Spring 1993). “When and When Not to Vertically Integrate,” Sloan Management Review, 34, 3, ABI/INFORM Global pg. 71.

Whitaker, A. (2016). Art Thinking. New York: Harper Business.

Whitaker, A. (2016, July 20). “Why Teach Business to Artists,” Hyperallergic [web log post]. Retrieved from https://hyperallergic.com/312390/why-teach-business-to-artists/


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Amy Whitaker

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Artivate is published by Arizona State University Herberger Institute for Design and the Arts Enterprise and Entrepreneurship Programs.
Photography credit: Tim Trumble Photography ©Arizona Board of Regents. All rights reserved.